Former Nigerian Minister of Aviation, Femi Fani-Kayode, has once again sparked controversy with a scathing retort to Kemi Badenoch, the British Secretary of State for Business and Trade. In his response to Badenoch’s remarks about Nigeria’s governance and its impact on her wealthy family, Fani-Kayode took to his official X handle to deliver a blistering critique of Britain’s moral and social landscape.
Badenoch, a Nigerian-born British politician, reportedly stated, “I don’t want Britain to be poor like Nigeria. My wealthy family became poorer there because of terrible government.” This prompted Fani-Kayode to unleash an impassioned defense of Nigeria, contrasting the country’s perceived poverty with what he described as Britain’s moral decay.
In his post, Fani-Kayode criticized Britain for what he called a culture of moral degradation, highlighting issues such as the legalization of same-sex marriages, the normalization of transgender rights, and the alleged erosion of traditional values. He accused Britain of fostering an environment where “perverts, deviants, and child predators hold sway,” claiming Nigeria’s adherence to Christian and Muslim principles gives it a moral upper hand despite its economic challenges.
“I would rather live in ‘poor’ Nigeria than in ‘rich’ Britain where men marry men, women marry women, and paedophilia is celebrated. Nigeria may be poor, but at least we hold fast to our Christian and Muslim values,” Fani-Kayode declared.
Fani-Kayode didn’t hold back in his assessment of Badenoch, describing her as a “self-hating Aunty Jemima” who despises her Nigerian heritage and panders to what he called the racist establishment of her adopted country. He accused her of consistently undermining Nigeria and its people to win favor with white supremacists and neo-Nazis.
In a particularly biting remark, he wrote:
“This psychologically disturbed, self-loathing Uncle Tom, who takes pride in being described as the proverbial ‘house ngger,’ consistently denigrates 250 million Nigerians just to please her new-found masters.”*
Fani-Kayode contrasted the challenges faced by Nigeria, such as poverty and governance issues, with what he described as Britain’s moral and spiritual decline. He criticized Britain for its perceived hostility towards Christians and Muslims, as well as its treatment of minorities, including Black, Arab, and South Asian communities.
“Nigeria may be poor, but we know God and will not burn in hell for eternity for replacing Him with pride, arrogance, and vanity,” Fani-Kayode argued, emphasizing the country’s resilience and adherence to faith as a counterbalance to its economic struggles.
Fani-Kayode concluded his fiery statement with a call to declare Kemi Badenoch persona non grata in Nigeria, arguing that her consistent denigration of the country and its people should disqualify her from stepping foot on Nigerian soil.
“Surely it is time to declare this insufferable creature persona non grata and prevent it from coming to our shores,” he wrote.
The post has ignited intense debates on social media, with opinions sharply divided. While some praised Fani-Kayode for defending Nigeria’s moral values and cultural heritage, others criticized his comments as overly harsh and inflammatory, arguing that they do little to address Nigeria’s pressing socioeconomic challenges.
As the exchange between Fani-Kayode and Badenoch gains traction, it highlights broader questions about national identity, governance, and the clash of values between African and Western societies. Whether this latest controversy will lead to further discourse or simply add to the existing polarization remains to be seen.
This fiery exchange underscores the growing tensions between the diaspora and homeland perspectives, as well as the delicate balancing act of defending one’s heritage while addressing its flaws. In an era of global interconnectedness, the question of where moral and economic priorities lie continues to fuel passionate debates.
PIONEER NEWS 