Tinubu Betrayed Agreement on Nnamdi Kanu, Sent Seyi to US as Pre-Election Bargaining Chip – Kanu’s Family

In a revelation stirring public outrage, the family of Nnamdi Kanu, the detained leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), has accused President Bola Ahmed Tinubu of reneging on a pre-election agreement concerning Kanu’s release. The allegations, reported by Sahara Reporters and amplified on Nigerian Stories’ official X (formerly Twitter) handle, suggest a calculated betrayal by Tinubu after leveraging his son, Seyi Tinubu, in discussions with the United States before the 2023 general elections.

According to Kanu’s family, Tinubu allegedly sent his son, Seyi, to negotiate with influential figures in the US, promising to address Kanu’s continued detention if he secured their support for his presidential bid. However, months into his administration, they claim the president has not honored the purported agreement, leaving Kanu’s fate unchanged.

“This is a blatant act of dishonesty,” a family spokesperson reportedly stated. “Tinubu exploited Nnamdi Kanu’s plight for political gain and abandoned his promises once he assumed power.”

The accusations have reignited tensions in the southeast region, where Kanu’s incarceration has fueled unrest and deepened distrust in the federal government. Critics argue that Tinubu’s failure to act reflects a broader pattern of insincerity and disregard for pressing national issues.

For many Nigerians, this revelation underscores the lack of political accountability in the country. Kanu’s prolonged detention by the Department of State Services (DSS), despite several court rulings ordering his release, remains a flashpoint for human rights advocates and separatist sympathizers alike.

The IPOB leader’s family further alleged that the president’s silence on the matter signals a disregard for justice and due process. “How can we trust a government that negotiates in bad faith?” the family questioned.

As the story circulates, public opinion remains divided. While some Nigerians express outrage at the alleged betrayal, others view the claims with skepticism, questioning the veracity of the family’s account.

This development adds a new layer of complexity to the already volatile political climate in Nigeria, with critics calling for transparency and action. Whether Tinubu addresses these allegations or continues to sideline the issue remains to be seen, but the pressure on his administration to deliver justice is mounting.

With Kanu’s plight becoming a symbol of larger systemic issues, the question looms: will President Tinubu honor his alleged promises, or will this controversy further erode public confidence in his leadership?

Leave a comment