Peter Obi Criticizes Tinubu’s Frequent Overseas Trips, Urges Focus on Nigerian States

In a pointed critique of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s leadership priorities, former presidential candidate Peter Obi has taken to social media to call for a shift in focus from international travels to addressing domestic issues.

Through his verified X (formerly Twitter) handle, Obi referenced a Sahara Reporters article highlighting that Tinubu has made 30 overseas trips since assuming office. Obi questioned the necessity of these frequent foreign engagements while pressing issues persist within Nigeria’s borders.

“President Tinubu has made 30 public trips overseas,” Obi stated. “It’s time to start visiting Nigerian states and engaging with the challenges our citizens face daily.”

The remarks have sparked a wave of public debate, with many Nigerians echoing Obi’s sentiments. Critics argue that the president’s globetrotting has done little to alleviate the pressing economic and social issues plaguing the country. From the skyrocketing cost of living to the lingering security challenges, they believe Tinubu’s presence and action on home soil are urgently required.

Supporters of the president, however, contend that these international visits are crucial for fostering diplomatic ties and securing economic partnerships. They maintain that Tinubu’s engagements abroad are strategic efforts to reposition Nigeria on the global stage.

Peter Obi’s critique underscores the growing frustration among citizens who feel disconnected from their government’s priorities. As the leader of the Labour Party and a prominent voice for reform, Obi has consistently called for policies that prioritize the welfare of Nigerians.

This latest statement adds to his ongoing push for a leadership approach rooted in accountability, inclusivity, and a clear focus on addressing local challenges.

With Nigeria grappling with widespread economic hardships and systemic issues, the question remains: will Tinubu’s administration recalibrate its priorities to address domestic concerns, or will the overseas trips continue to dominate the president’s itinerary?

This unfolding discourse highlights the broader debate about the balance between international diplomacy and local governance—a critical challenge for any nation seeking to thrive on both fronts.

Leave a comment