Renowned human rights activist and former Senator, Shehu Sani, has sparked a critical conversation on the World Bank’s projections for economic recovery and global hardship. In a pointed post on his official X (formerly Twitter) handle, Sani expressed deep concern over the institution’s assertion that it may take up to 15 years before the world reaches its so-called “promised land” of stability and prosperity.
Sani, known for his outspoken views on international and domestic issues, didn’t mince words. He questioned the practicality of the World Bank’s timeline, asking, “How many people will still be around to enjoy the fruits of the World Bank’s promised land after enduring hardship for another 15 years?”
His skepticism didn’t end there. Sani threw a spotlight on the World Bank’s track record in Africa, where many countries still grapple with entrenched poverty despite decades of interventions. “The question is, how many African countries has the World Bank successfully taken to the promised land?” he probed, casting doubt on the institution’s ability to deliver transformative results, especially in the Global South.
This critique from the former lawmaker taps into a broader debate about the role of global financial institutions in alleviating poverty, with many questioning whether their policies are designed to uplift or entrench inequality in developing nations.
Sani’s post has ignited a wave of responses online, with many citizens echoing his frustrations over the seemingly never-ending cycle of poverty and underdevelopment that has plagued African nations despite countless international aid programs. As the discourse grows, one thing remains clear—Sani’s words have touched a nerve, shining a spotlight on the urgent need for a re-evaluation of global economic policies and their true impact on vulnerable nations.
In an era where the average citizen is already buckling under the weight of inflation, rising costs, and economic uncertainty, the idea of waiting another decade and a half for relief seems not only daunting but unjust. Sani’s challenge to the World Bank raises important questions about the efficacy of its strategies and whether the current path leads to genuine development—or merely a prolonged state of dependency.
PIONEER NEWS 